Page 36 - Plastics News October 2023
P. 36

FEATURE






          Thermoformer Cuts Cost, Lead Time Using 3D-Printed Molds





































               ichigan-based  thermoformer   Duo Form collaborated with 3D Sys-  ditive manufacturing to create molds
          MDuo Form collaborated with 3D  tems  to integrate  additive  manufac-  enables freedom of design to produce
          Systems  to integrate  additive manu-  turing into its production process,  shapes that cannot be made with tra-
          facturing into its production process.  becoming more agile by 3D printing  ditional methods.
          Michigan-based thermoformer Duo    production molds,  tools,  and  repre-  The additive manufacturing process
          Form is shortening lead times and   sentative  samples for  thermoform-  only requires using the  amount of
          reducing  costs  by  using  3D printing   ing and vacuum forming. Combining   material  —  generally  a  polymer  —
          (aka additive manufacturing) to make   its EXT 1270 Titan pellet 3D printer   needed to create the part, which re-
          custom molds. By leveraging additive   and glass-filled polycarbonate pellets,   duces waste and cost. Additive man-
          manufacturing  techniques,  the  com-  Duo Form said it decreased costs and   ufacturing  offers  significantly  faster
          pany said it can quickly create various   shortened lead times without impact-  turnaround times to deliver a mold or
          mold designs and produce full-scale   ing  quality.  With  its  first  3D-printed   pattern — hours or days versus the
          prototypes that avoid delays in the ap-  mold — a shower pan for recreational   weeks and months required for tradi-
          proval and production processes.   vehicles — Duo Form said more than   tional manufacturing, according to 3D
                                             1,000  shots were  pulled from the
          With one project — a 1294 x 410 x   mold with no significant wear.     Systems Titan Director Clay Guillory.
          287 mm train interior panel — the                                      Selecting  the  best  3D-printing  tech-
          company said it reduced cost by 88%   Subtractive versus additive molds  nology for a project
          and lead time  by 65% compared  Conventional  subtractive  processes   When 3D printing production molds
          with traditional ceramic  mold meth-  selectively  remove material from a   for thermoforming and vacuum-form-
          ods. The savings were  even greater  block to create the desired shape for   ing processes, it’s important to select
          compared with  traditional  aluminum  a pattern or a mold. By contrast, ad-  the most appropriate 3D-printing
          molds, added Duo Form Product De-  ditive manufacturing processes build   technique  for the  mold being  pro-
          velopment  Manager David Rheinhe-  a part layer by layer using a range of   duced, Guillory said.
          imer.                              polymers and even metals. Using ad-


          36   PLASTICS NEWSASTICS NEWS                                                               October 2023
          36 PL
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41