Page 38 - Plastics News July 2018
P. 38

FeAtures




          The table on the previous page summarizes typical benefits   the part, iMFLUX’s ability to pack while it fills eliminates
          that result from these differences.                   unnecessary material, reducing part weight. Cycle time

          Four case studies                                     was reduced by 13%.
                                                                Case Study 4: A PP automotive component was run in
          Case Study 1: A polycarbonate medical part was converted   an eight-cavity tool on a 550-ton hydraulic machine. It
          to the iMFLUX process. The customer was experiencing
          high scrap rates due to an imbalanced 16-cavity mold with   previously ran on a 50-sec cycle, but after the iMFLUX
                                                                process was integrated to the press, the cycle time
          hot-runner valve gates, causing intermittent short shots.
          iMFLUX reduced scrap rate from more than 10% to less   was reduced by 8 sec, resulting in a 20% throughput
                                                                improvement. As described in Case Study #3, simultaneous
          than 0.2% by improving the balance from part to part. This
          is due to constant-pressure filling. Every part experiences   pack and fill created a 14% pressure reduction and a 1%
                                                                part-weight reduction. On top of this, iMFLUX’s ability to
          the same pressure and the geometry of the part tells the
          machine how to continually profile velocity, resulting in   dynamically absorb viscosity changes reduced the scrap
                                                                rate from 18% to 0.2%.
          consistent packing conditions. On top of eliminating short
          shots and gaining 48% improvement in cavity balance,   iMFLUX Process Benefits
          the cycle time was reduced by 30%. In this example the   Low constant pressure
          existing all-electric injection machine was retrofitted to   •   Lower clamp tonnage
          run the iMFLUX system.
                                                                •   Less retained stress
          Case Study 2: For a PP household-cleaning implement, iMFLUX   •   Uniform stress (less warp)
          was brought in during the design phase for new molds and   •   Lower melt temperatures
          presses. Knowing the benefits of pressure reduction, the   •   Less gate blush
          mold was designed to maximize the capabilities of the   •   Less flash
          technology. The part previously ran in a servo-hydraulic   •   Less cavity-to-cavity variation in multi-cavity & family
          500-ton machine with eight cavities and a 52-sec cycle.   molds
          The new iMFLUX mold and system allowed the use of a   •   Less material degradation
          conventional hydraulic 400-ton machine, while expanding
          cavitation by 50% to 12 cavities and reducing the cycle   Pack-as-it-fills
          by 21%.  Together, that resulted in a 91% throughput   •   Faster cycles
          improvement. Even with adding four cavities and reducing   •   Fewer sink marks
          cycle time, the overall peak injection pressure was 30%   •   Stronger weld lines
          lower than with the conventional process. While iMFLUX   •   Improved surface finish
          is effective on retrofitted machines with existing tooling,   No hesitation
          this case shows there are substantial benefits to designing   •   Reduced flow lines
          new molds specifically for the iMFLUX process.        •   Improved thin-walling
          Case Study 3: A PET packaging component was run in a   •   Higher L/T capability
          four-cavity  mold  on  a  hydraulic  press  retrofitted  with   •   Smaller cold runners
          the iMFLUX technology. The new process achieved a 16%   Cavity-pressure response
          throughput increase over the conventional process. On   •   Lighter parts (1-3%)
          average, retrofitted machines with existing molds achieve   •   Reduced flash
          15% to 25% throughput improvement. However, the       •   Automatic adjustment for viscosity
          iMFLUX process also reduced the cavity imbalance from   •   Real-time adjustment for blocked cavities
          6% to 0.8%, nearly halved the amount of pressure needed   •   Actuate sequential valve gates
          to fill the part (from 1079 bar to 622 bar), and reduced
          the average part weight by 0.48% while maintaining all   •   Not affected by leaky check ring
          dimensional  specifications.  By  packing  as  the  part  is   •   Not affected by worn barrel
          filled, pressures can be reduced. Furthermore, while a   Gene Altonen has been the Chief Technology Officer of
          conventional process fills at a high velocity and then packs   iMFLUX in Hamilton, Ohio, since 2015. (Plastics Technology)



          Plastics News  July  2018      38
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43